HRS §453-7.5
How the state reviews complaints about doctors
The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs must look into complaints about doctors and investigate if a doctor may have broken the law. If a violation is found, the case goes to the Hawaii Medical Board for discipline. Reports of peer review decisions are kept confidential.
courts
The statute, as written — Review of complaints and information by department
(a) The department of commerce and consumer affairs shall review each complaint, inquiry, and information, as applicable, received under sections 92-17, 329-44, 453-8.7, 663-1.7, and 671-5. The department shall investigate the complaint, inquiry, or information if it appears that the physician or osteopathic physician who is the subject of the complaint, inquiry, or information has violated this chapter. If the department determines that the physician or osteopathic physician has violated this chapter, the department shall present the results of its investigation to the Hawaii medical board for appropriate disciplinary proceedings. (b) Reports of adverse decisions of peer review committees transmitted to the department under section 663-1.7 shall not be available to public inspection or subject to discovery and shall be held confidential by the department; provided that: (1) A written affirmative or negative reply may be given to a written inquiry by a hospital or health care facility as to whether a report of an adverse decision is on file with the department; and (2) A subpoenaed report shall be subject to the requirements under section 453-17.
Sections this one refers to
§663-1.7 Protection for medical review committee members
§92-17 How to file a complaint about a licensed professional
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.