HRS §490:9-326.5
Priority when one secured party has control
This section says that if you have control over a controllable account, electronic record, or payment intangible, your security interest beats any other security interest in the same thing that does not have control. It only covers priority between secured parties.
landlordstenants
The statute, as written — Priority of security interest in controllable account, controllable electronic record, and controllable payment intangible
A security interest in a controllable account, controllable electronic record, or controllable payment intangible held by a secured party having control of the account, electronic record, or payment intangible shall have priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control.
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.