HRS §205A-26
Rules for reviewing projects in the special management area
This section tells the authority what to check before approving any project in the special management area. Projects must protect beaches, water, wildlife, and public access, and must not harm the environment. The authority must also make sure projects fit with county plans and zoning.
countiesdevelopersstate agencies
The statute, as written — Special management area guidelines
In implementing this part, the authority shall adopt the following guidelines for the review of developments proposed in the special management area: (1) All development in the special management area shall be subject to reasonable terms and conditions set by the authority in order to ensure: (A) Adequate access, by dedication or other means, to publicly owned or used beaches, recreation areas, and natural reserves is provided to the extent consistent with sound conservation principles; (B) Adequate and properly located public recreation areas and wildlife preserves are reserved; (C) Provisions are made for solid and liquid waste treatment, disposition, and management that will minimize adverse effects upon special management area resources; and (D) Alterations to existing land forms and vegetation, except crops, and construction of structures shall cause minimum adverse effect to water resources, beaches, coastal dunes, and scenic and recreational amenities and minimize impacts from floods, wind damage, storm surge, landslides, erosion, sea level rise, siltation, or failure in the event of earthquake. (2) No development shall be approved unless the authority has first found: (A) That the development will not have any significant adverse environmental or ecological effect, except as any adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interests. Those adverse effects shall include but not be limited to the potential cumulative impact of individual developments, each of which taken by itself might not have a significant adverse effect, and the elimination of planning options; (B) That the development is consistent with the objectives, policies, and special management area guidelines of this chapter and any guidelines enacted by the legislature; and (C) That the development is consistent with the county general plan, community plan, and zoning; provided that a finding of consistency shall not preclude concurrent processing where a general plan, community plan, or zoning amendment may also be required. (3) The authority shall seek to minimize, where reasonable: (A) Dredging, filling or otherwise altering any bay, estuary, salt marsh, river mouth, slough or lagoon; (B) Any development that would reduce the size of any beach or other area usable for public recreation; (C) Any development that would reduce or impose restrictions upon public access to tidal and submerged lands, beaches, portions of rivers and streams within the special management areas and the mean high tide line where there is no beach; (D) Any development that would substantially interfere with or detract from the line of sight toward the sea from the state highway nearest the coast; and (E) Any development that would adversely affect water quality, existing areas of open water free of visible structures, existing and potential fisheries and fishing grounds, wildlife habitats, or potential or existing agricultural uses of land.
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.