HRS §393-19
Workers can bargain for better health coverage
This section says the prepaid health care law does not stop workers from bargaining for different health coverage, as long as the negotiated plan is at least as good as the law requires. If a union agreement covers health care, the employer is considered to have met the law's requirements. Workers not covered by such an agreement still get the law's protections.
employeesemployers
The statute, as written — Freedom of collective bargaining
(a) In addition to the policy stated in section 393-2, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the freedom of employees to bargain collectively for different prepaid health care coverage, if the protection provided by the negotiated plan is more favorable to the employees benefited than the protection provided by this chapter or at least equivalent thereto, or for a different allocation of the costs thereof. A collective bargaining agreement may provide that the employer oneself undertakes to provide the health care specified in the agreement. (b) If the employees rendering particular types of services are not covered by the health care provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreements to which their employer is a party, the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable with respect to them. An employer or group of employers shall be deemed to have complied with the provisions of this chapter if they undertake to provide health care services pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and the services are available to all other employees not covered by such agreement.
Sections this one refers to
§393-2 Why Hawaii requires prepaid health care for workers
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.