HRS §490:2-615
When a seller can be excused for not delivering goods
This section explains when a seller is not in breach of contract for failing to deliver goods. It applies if an unexpected event makes performance impracticable, or if the seller follows a government order. The seller must notify the buyer and, if only part of the goods are affected, allocate fairly among customers.
buyers
The statute, as written — Excuse by failure of presupposed conditions
Except so far as a seller may have assumed a greater obligation and subject to the preceding section on substituted performance: (a) Delay in delivery or nondelivery in whole or in part by a seller who complies with paragraphs (b) and (c) is not a breach of his duty under a contract for sale if performance as agreed has been made impracticable by the occurrence of a contingency the nonoccurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made or by compliance in good faith with any applicable foreign or domestic governmental regulation or order whether or not it later proves to be invalid. (b) Where the causes mentioned in paragraph (a) affect only a part of the seller's capacity to perform, he must allocate production and deliveries among his customers but may at his option include regular customers not then under contract as well as his own requirements for further manufacture. He may so allocate in any manner which is fair and reasonable. (c) The seller must notify the buyer seasonably that there will be delay or nondelivery and, when allocation is required under paragraph (b), of the estimated quota thus made available for the buyer.
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.