← Back to search

HRS §583A-110

How courts in different states can talk to each other

This section explains how a Hawaii court can talk to a court in another state about a case under this law. The court can let the people involved join the conversation, but if they can't, they must get a chance to share facts and legal arguments before the court decides who has jurisdiction. Some routine talks don't need a record, but other talks must be recorded and shared with the people.

courts

The statute, as written — Communication between courts

(a) A court of this State may communicate with a court in another state concerning a proceeding arising under this chapter. (b) The court may allow the parties to participate in the communication. If the parties are not able to participate in the communication, they must be given the opportunity to present facts and legal arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made. (c) Communication between courts on schedules, calendars, court records, and similar matters may occur without informing the parties. A record need not be made of the communication. (d) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), a record must be made of a communication under this section. The parties must be informed promptly of the communication and granted access to the record. (e) For the purposes of this section, "record" means information that is: (1) Inscribed on a tangible medium; or (2) Stored in an electronic or other medium; and is retrievable in perceivable form. It includes a written summary prepared and approved by the presiding judge and entered into the court record.
Read the official text at capitol.hawaii.gov ↗as published Jan 6, 2026our copy taken Aug 20, 2026

LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.