HRS §602-10
How the Supreme Court handles full hearings and substitute judges
This section explains that people in Supreme Court cases have a right to have their case considered by the full court. Oral arguments usually happen before the full court, but the court can skip them in some cases. If a justice cannot serve, a circuit judge or retired justice can step in temporarily.
courts
The statute, as written — [OLD] REPEALED
L 1972, c 88, §2(h). §602-10 Full court; oral argument; substitute justices. Parties to a proceeding before the supreme court shall be entitled to consideration by a full court. Oral argument shall be before a full court; provided that in an appropriate case, the court in its discretion may dispense with oral argument. In case of a vacancy, or if a justice of the supreme court is disqualified from sitting in any case pending before the supreme court, is unable to attend, is absent, is recused, or has been excused, the vacancy or the place of such justice may be temporarily filled by a circuit judge designated by the chief justice or by the appointment of a justice who has retired from the supreme court. Such retired justice chosen to serve as substitute justice shall not be actively engaged in the practice of law. A retired justice, when sitting as substitute justice, shall be compensated at a rate of pay of associate justices of the supreme court. When necessary, the court may consist of five circuit judges so designated, or five retired justices so appointed, or any combination of circuit judges and retired justices. After oral argument of a case, if a vacancy arises or if for any other reason a justice is unable to continue on the case, the case may be decided or disposed of upon the concurrence of any three members of the court without filling the vacancy or the place of such justice.
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.