HRS §701-104
How to read and apply this criminal code
This section explains how judges must interpret the criminal code. They cannot stretch its words to create new crimes. Instead, they must read the words fairly and in context, aiming to achieve justice and the law's purpose.
courts
The statute, as written — Principles of construction
The provisions of this Code cannot be extended by analogy so as to create crimes not provided for herein; however, in order to promote justice and effect the objects of the law, all of its provisions shall be given a genuine construction, according to the fair import of the words, taken in their usual sense, in connection with the context, and with reference to the purpose of the provision. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1] COMMENTARY ON §701-104 This section, read in conjunction with §701-103, is intended to assure that this Code will be construed by the courts in such a way as to effectuate the declared purposes of the law. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTARY ON §701-104 Section 104 of the Proposed Draft of the Code read: "The rule that a penal statute is to be strictly construed does not apply to this Code, but the provisions herein must be construed according to the fair import of their terms." The legislature found that such broad wording would subject the Code to unwarranted argument and attempted to avoid this possibility by revising the entire section. Through the section, as enacted, the legislature sought to limit the scope of the fair import principle. See Conference Committee Report No. 2 (1972). The committee report also states: "It is the intent of the Committee that definitions of crimes are to be strictly construed."
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.