← Back to search

HRS §88-159

Rechecking a disabled retiree's pension status

The pension board can re-examine a retired police, fire, or band member to see if their disability continues. The retiree gets notice, can be present, ask questions, and present evidence. If the medical board says the retiree is fit, the retiree returns to active duty and full pay, and pension payments stop.

The statute, as written — Reexamination of disability beneficiary; hearing

After any member of the police force, fire department, or band has been retired upon pension by reason of disability, the board of trustees shall have the right at any time to cause the retired member again to be brought before it and examined by the medical board, and shall also have the right to examine other witnesses for the purpose of discovering whether the disability still continues, and whether the retired member should remain on the pension roll; but the retired member shall be retained on the pension roll until reinstated in the service of the police force, fire department or band, except in case of dismissal or resignation. The retired member shall be entitled to notice, and to be present at the hearing of evidence, shall be permitted to propound any question pertinent or relevant to the matter and shall also have the right to introduce evidence upon the retired member's own behalf. All witnesses so produced shall be examined under oath and any member of the board of trustees is authorized to administer the oath. Should the retired member recover from the retired member's disability and be, in the opinion of the medical board, again fit for active duty, then the member shall again be put on active duty and full pay, and from the time the board of trustees shall decide that the member is fit for active duty, the member shall cease to be entitled to any payments out of the pension system because of disability for which the member was retired.
Read the official text at capitol.hawaii.gov ↗as published Jan 6, 2026our copy taken Aug 20, 2026

LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.