← Back to search

MCC §14.21A.330

When an accidental discharge can be excused

Read the official text at library.municode.com ↗

This section explains when a business can use an 'upset'—an accidental, temporary failure to meet pretreatment rules—as a legal excuse. To use this excuse, the business must prove the upset happened, report it quickly, and show it was operating properly. If the treatment facility loses power, the business must still control its discharges until the problem is fixed.

businesses

The ordinance, as written (Maui County) — Affirmative defenses to discharge violations

A copy, taken August 21, 2026. The version published by Maui County is the one that governs, and it may have changed since. Check it before relying on anything here.

A. Upset. For the purposes of this section, "upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. An "upset" does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. B. An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of subsection C of this section are met. C. A user who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: 1. An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset; 2. At the time, the facility was being operated in a prudent and proper manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and 3. The user has verbally submitted the following information to the director within twenty-four hours of becoming aware of the upset, and provided a written submission within five days: a. A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance, b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to cease, and c. Steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. D. In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof. E. Users will have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails. F. Users shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails. (Ord. 2760 § 4 (part), 1999)
Read the official text at library.municode.com ↗as published Nov 21, 2025our copy taken Aug 21, 2026

Published by the County of Maui through Municode.

LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.