ROH §36-6.12
City inspection of ride-hailing company records
Read the official text at honolulu.gov ↗The city can look at a random sample of a ride-hailing company's records once a year to check that the company follows the rules. The records must be kept for two years and can be on paper or computer. The city must keep these records confidential and cannot share them without the company's written permission.
businesses
The ordinance, as written (Honolulu County) — Audit or inspection of records of private transportation companies, drivers, and vehicles
A copy, taken August 22, 2026. The version published by Honolulu is the one that governs, and it may have changed since. Check it before relying on anything here.
(a) The department may visually inspect, no more than annually, a sample of records, randomly selected by the department, that a private transportation company is required to maintain for the sole purpose of verifying that the private transportation company is in compliance with the requirements of this article. The records of the private transportation company must substantiate the certification of the private transportation drivers and vehicles, and include all complaints made against the private transportation driver to the company by any passenger or member of the general public. Any record furnished to the department may exclude information that would tend to identify specific drivers or riders. The records must be located at the local business address stated in the private transportation company’s registration with the department, in accordance with § 36-6.3 , for inspection, and may be in either paper or electronic format. The records must be retained by the private transportation company for a period of two years.
(b) Any records inspected by the department pursuant to this section are:
(1) Designated confidential;
(2) Not subject to disclosure to a third party by the department without prior written consent of the private transportation company; and
(3) Exempt from disclosure under HRS Chapter 92F, the Hawaii Uniform Information Practices Act (“UIPA”).
Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the applicability of any other exemptions under HRS Chapter 92F.
Published by the City and County of Honolulu through American Legal Publishing.
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.