HRS §124B-69
Protection from being tried twice for the same offense
This section protects people from being tried twice in a state military court for the same crime without their consent. It explains when a court-martial counts as a trial for this protection, which depends on how far the case has progressed. If a case is dismissed early, it may not count as a trial.
everyone
The statute, as written — Former jeopardy
(a) No person shall without the person's consent be tried a second time in any military court of the State for the same offense. (b) No proceeding in which an accused has been found guilty by a court-martial upon any charge or specification shall be a trial under this section until the finding of guilty has become final after review of the case has been fully completed. (c) A court-martial with a military judge alone is a trial in the sense of this section if, without fault of the accused: (1) After introduction of evidence; and (2) Before announcement of findings under section 124B-79, the case is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses. (d) A court-martial with a military judge and members is a trial in the sense of this section if, without fault of the accused: (1) After the members, having taken an oath or affirmation as members under section 124B-67 and after completion of challenges under section 124B-66, are impaneled; and (2) Before announcement of findings under section 124B-79, the case is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses.
Sections this one refers to
§124B-66 Challenging court-martial judges and members
§124B-67 Swearing in court-martial officials and witnesses
§124B-79 How courts announce verdicts and decide punishments
LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.