← Back to search

HRS §635-29

How many jurors each side can reject without giving a reason

This section sets how many jurors each side can reject without giving a reason. In criminal cases, the rules come from another section. In civil cases, each side gets three rejections, with possible extras for multiple parties or alternate jurors.

attorneysbeneficiariesbusinessesbuyerschildrencountiescourtscreditorsdebtorsdomestic partnersemployeesemployersfinancial institutionsguardiansheirslandownersnotariesparentspersonal representativesspousesstate agenciestrusteesvulnerable adultswards

The statute, as written — Challenging peremptorily

(a) In addition to the challenges of jurors allowed in section 635-28, the State and defendant in criminal cases shall be allowed peremptory challenges as provided by section 635-30. (b) In civil cases each party shall be allowed to challenge peremptorily three jurors, without assigning any reason therefor. Where there are two or more plaintiffs or two or more defendants, they may be considered as a single party for the purposes of making peremptory challenges, or the court may allow additional peremptory challenges and permit them to be exercised separately or jointly. If additional peremptory challenges are allowed to the parties on one side, the opposing party or parties may be allowed additional peremptory challenges. (c) If an alternate juror or alternate jurors are to be impaneled, one or more additional peremptory challenges shall be allowed as provided by the rules of court.
Read the official text at capitol.hawaii.gov ↗as published Jan 6, 2026our copy taken Aug 20, 2026

Sections this one refers to

§635-28 Removing a juror for a valid reason

LawTrove is not legal advice. The summary above is a computer-generated restatement — the authoritative text is the official version linked above.